Please leave an blank line at the end of each file.

The top: 0 property effectively resets the original -30px positioning. While this improves alignment on larger screens, verify that the visual positioning of the task count number relative to surrounding text is acceptable across all breakpoints. The original negative top value was likely intentional for visual alignment.

The animation timing has been changed from 30s linear 0s infinite running slidein to 30s linear infinite slidein. While both are functionally equivalent (the 0s delay and running state are defaults), ensure this simplified syntax is consistent with project conventions and doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior.

The content-width mixin already applies padding: 0 2vw for screens under 1280px. Adding padding: 0 20px here will override that padding, resulting in fixed 20px padding instead of the responsive 2vw padding. On a 1280px screen, 2vw equals 25.6px, which is close to 20px. However, on smaller screens like 640px, 2vw equals 12.8px, but this code forces 20px, which may be too much padding on mobile devices. Consider using the mixin's existing responsive padding or adjusting it conditionally with media queries.

The content-width mixin already applies padding: 0 2vw for screens under 1280px. Adding padding: 0 20px here will override that padding, resulting in fixed 20px padding instead of the responsive 2vw padding. On smaller screens like 640px, 2vw equals 12.8px, but this code forces 20px, which may be excessive. Consider using the mixin's existing responsive padding or adjusting it conditionally with media queries.

The footer links are centered with justify-content: center on all screen sizes, but the original design likely had them spread across the footer width with justify-content: space-between. This changes the visual layout significantly. If centering is intentional for better mobile responsiveness, consider keeping space-between on larger screens and only switching to center on smaller screens where wrapping occurs.

The content-width mixin already applies padding: 0 2vw for screens under 1280px. Adding padding: 0 20px here will override that padding, resulting in fixed 20px padding instead of the responsive 2vw padding. On smaller screens like 640px, 2vw equals 12.8px, but this code forces 20px, which may be excessive. Consider using the mixin's existing responsive padding or adjusting it conditionally with media queries.

The content-width mixin already applies padding: 0 2vw for screens under 1280px. Adding padding: 0 20px here will override that padding, resulting in fixed 20px padding instead of the responsive 2vw padding. On smaller screens like 640px, 2vw equals 12.8px, but this code forces 20px, which may be excessive. Consider using the mixin's existing responsive padding or adjusting it conditionally with media queries.

There's a trailing blank line in this CSS block. While not functionally problematic, it's inconsistent with the rest of the codebase's formatting. Consider removing the blank line for consistency.

The button positioning changes from absolute to static based on screen size, which is good for responsive design. However, ensure that on screens >= 1025px the absolute positioning doesn't cause the button to overlap with content when the card content is shorter than expected. Consider testing with varying content lengths.

The change from hiding the image (display: none) to showing it responsively (max-width: 100%) is an improvement for smaller screens. However, verify that this doesn't cause performance issues on mobile devices, especially if the images are large. Consider implementing lazy loading or using responsive image sources (srcset) if the images are particularly large.